Tuesday, November 3, 2009

SAAC the CSA

I urge everyone to have a listen to the Dino Rossi interview from today's It's Called Football Weekly show. You can find it below this post. Although the Jeff Cunningham interview is undoubtedly sexier, the issues that Dino touch upon are vital to the future of the sport in Canada.

In summery, Dino updated us on the ongoing efforts of the Soccer Academies Association of Canada (SAAC) to get its players registered by the CSA. It seems like a fairly innocent request, and it's actually mandated by FIFA to happen, but yet soccer officials in this country continue to drag their feet.

Dino was somewhat diplomatic in his answer as to why there is a resistance to registering the SAAC players. He can't afford to piss too many people off in his role on the Board of Directors at SAAC. However, I can state it a little clearer.

Some clubs are fighting SAAC because they feel that the academies are "stealing" their best players and are therefore putting them at a competitive disadvantage when they play other clubs for provincial championships. Basically they are willing to blackball children so they have a better chance to win a shiny trophy with their u-14 squad.

To convince parents to go along with their efforts they tell tall, cautionary tales about big, bad academy owners that are only in it for the money and that will make promises that they can't keep to players that aren't good enough to play beyond the community level.

There is no doubt that there are people in this world that look to profit off of the dreams of kids. But, one of the components of SAAC is to ensure that its members are operating under a unified best practices that will prevent operators from taking advantage of players and their families. Basically, SAAC isn't going to let anyone with a pitch and whistle into their association. There are strict standards that need to be kept for membership in SAAC. If a player enrols in an academy they will be getting exactly what they were promised. What they do with that training is then up to them.

The irony of this type of argument against the registering of academy players is that FIFA brought in the requirement for registration as part of an effort to protect the players. Some in Canada are trying to make the opposite argument -- that NOT allowing those players to be registered is what protects them. It's counterintuitive.

Ultimately, as Dino said in the interview, SAAC is about giving people choice. And choice is good.

I've often been asked by readers why I've never published a multi-part series detailing how I would want to see the CSA fixed. The answer is that it's because many others already have and that I don't have a lot more to offer the subject. However, allow me to use this issue as a jumping of point for a succenict response to that ultimate question of What To Do About The CSA.

The problems with the organization can all be seen with this one issue. It's toothless, takes its orders from the provinces (which, in turn, take their orders from the community clubs). The old adage of the tail wagging the dog applies here -- and it's a problem. So long as the CSA refuses to step up and lay claim to what it rightfully theirs (control of the game) we are destined to flounder around, directionless.

How would I fix the CSA? By forcing it to demonstrate some leadership. Even though this change is mandated by FIFA it hasn't happened yet. Why is that? Likely because the CSA is trying to figure out how to satisfy the provinces, while getting FIFA off its back about the requirement.

If leadership was centralized, we wouldn't have this problem.

You can fix a lot by simply centralizing the decision making. Let the provinces handle the important recreation market. Leave the elite programs to the CSA, where they belong.

There is a lot wrong with the Canadian system, but making that one simple change will go a long ways to fixing many of the issues. And it might even allow for the radical concept of having every kid that plays this game, actually recognized by the national body.

Crazy, eh?

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Wow, it's great that all of the world's issues are so one-sided/black and white.

Duane Rollins said...

So anon - Justify denying A KID the right to be protected by his national governing body.

Go...

Dan. said...

Thanks for bringing this issue to light..there is little discussion of this anywhere.

Anonymous said...

Thank you, I only wish more people new how poorly soccer is run in this country. It is embarrassing. They are essentially saying, as far as we are concerned we do not support you and we do not recognize you as a soccer player in this country.

It's not like they can look at there track record and say what a great job they have done in the past. How do these people hold on to there positions as Directors and Executive Committee Members. Obviously they are incapable of blowing themselves up, we need someone with the power to do it for them.

Shame on the Provincial Associations and shame on the CSA!

krye said...

I don't know what it is like in Ontario where most of the SAAC members are but most of the players in the BC affiliate of the SAAC are also club players and therefore registered with the CSA. Academies and clubs are not mutually exclusive. The kids want to play competitive games in a league which means they need to be in a club structure. The elite players often suppliment their training with academy programs. I think the recommended ratio of training to games is something like 3 or 4 training sessions for each game. Unless the academies can provide the games with a chance of winning something we will need a solid club system to keep the players interested and motivated.

J said...

I don't agree with anon 7:07, but private sports academies in general are notorious for shadiness and exploitiveness and I suspect the CSA is doing its due diligence before bringing them under their umbrella.

Anonymous said...

This is all about control. There is a monopoly on the game in this country and the establishment is currently stalling so they can build some more internal barriers to make it as difficult to open this part of the world to competiton. A few days after this surfaced back in Sept BCSA and Whitecaps announced their "partnership" that discluded all academy environments from the "correct" development pathways. And shortly after that, the District which the SAAC affiliate resides in was awarded District Development status by the BCSA.

My understanding is that there are several unregisterred players at this SAAC affiliate.

Anonymous said...

The reason why the clubs are so opposed to the ideas of academies is the fear of competition.

Right now the clubs can continue to run poor programs at every age level and they have a captured audience. If you want to play in competitive games with sanctioned referees you need to play for a club.

When you open the door up to competition it means you now have to perform to a higher standard in order to survive.

One thing that I have learned over time is that parents are more than willing to pay extra for quality programs if they feel it will benefit their child. On the other hand, parents will not pay an extra $5 to the CSA because it is just a waste of money.

A few parents/players might get dragged in to poorly run academies, but those academies won't last financially if they cannot offer quality programming and maintain their player base over time.

The only reason why any of this is even an issue is because most of the clubs in Canada do not offer a proper training program to players of all ages and abilities.

The club has so many more adavantages over any academy in Canada and yet they are still losing players to them.

Players want more, they deserve more. Why do we always put up road blocks?

Open up the competition. The worst thing that can happen is that the clubs will need to get their act together and start offering better programs. If they do that it won't even be an issue. If they are not willing to do that, let them fail.

Something better will rise from the ashes.

This issue has nothing to do with players or parents. Only provincial associations and clubs not willing to be accountable for their actions.

Post a Comment