There was a shocking development in Mexican football this weekend. A club, in this case Monterrey, that wasn't the best over the course of a season captured the league's opening stage championship.
Apparently the Mexicans use a system called a "playoff" to determine their champion. And to think, no Mexican fan has stormed the league office demanding the Toluca be declared champion, based on their regular season play.
Ok, enough with the sarcasm. Yes, other leagues in the world use a playoff format. Most MLS fans know this, but that doesn't stop the endless rambling by certain types that want the Supporter's Shield champion to be declared champs.
It ain't ever gonna happen.
MLS fans that are a bit playoff leery would be best lobbying for changes to the system that would give a greater advantage to the regular season leaders.
And, according to several sources, the league is looking at doing just that. The most popular rumour that has emerged as a possible new format is one that sees two four team groups played, based on conferences. They then play one game against each other team in the group with the home team in all cases being the team that finished with the best regular season point total.
So first place in the each group would play three home games, while second would play two and third one. The final playoff team in both groups would have to play all three games on the road.
It would be hard to argue that a fourth place team didn't deserve to win the title if it managed to do so after winning four straight road games.
There are other systems worth thinking about. Curling's page system might be a solution as well. In it the top four teams make the playoffs in each conference. No. 1 plays No 2, while No. 3 plays No 4. The winner of the 1 v 2 game gets a direct bye to the conference final, while the loser of that game plays the winner of the No. 3 v No. 4 game (the loser there is eliminated.
Australia uses a page playoff system in the A-League.
Regardless, get the idea of no playoffs right on out of your head. Besides the fact that it won't happen, I've yet to hear a compelling reason why anyone should want it to happen.
This is the twenty-first post in my 24-hours of blogging marathon. The purpose is to raise some funds to allow The 24th Minute to continue to provide quality (and quantity) coverage of Canadian, MLS and world football.
If you like what I do, please consider supporting the Toonie project -- my call for a voluntary $2 a month subscription to the blog ($24/year).
Donations of any amount are accepted through PayPal (link to the right) or e-mail money transfer (dgrollins@gmail.com). Also e-mail me to arrange other forms of donation (or trade).
Basketball: Just desserts ...
2 days ago

1 comments:
I've got no issue with Playoffs in soccer per se.
However, I believe that if you run a single 30 (or so) game season, the team that earns the most points at the end of that season should be deemed Champion of the League. Giving out the Supporters Shield is a nice honour but that should be deemed the biggest award of the year because it rewards excellence over the long run.
Having a playoff after the season is great too. It keeps fans of clubs who had no hope of winning the supporter shield interested (just like teams who have no hope of winning EPL title might stay interested in the season if their club is still involved in Carling Cup or FA Cup play).
I prefer considering the playoffs a seperate, league cup competition (like Carling Cup), open only to the top 8 clubs from that season. I say use whatever fun system you wish to determine who plays who in each round. Hand out the MLS Cup at the end of that playoff, as they do now. This type of elimination tournament is great fun.
Just don't devalue the accomplishment that is winning the whole league and, unfortunately, that is effectively what happens in MLS when the Supporter Shield winner is not held up in the same positive light as the winner of a 4 week, end of season tournament. That is simply wrong and one of my 3 biggest pet peeves regarding MLS (the others being contracts owned by the league rather than owner by the individual clubs and the lack of a real youth academy system due to a preference to rely on NCAA for player development).
- VPjr
Post a Comment