Monday, May 31, 2010

TFC Wednesday

Paul Beirne on the U-Sector board a few moments ago:


Adding 7 names to TFC roster for NCC: Stinson, Henry, Matheson, Lindsay, McNicoll, Cordon, Camargo


So I guess there is your answer...and people have always wanted to see how a CSL team would do in the V-Cup...

Barrett's yellow

Chad Barrett received a yellow card for his celebration following TFC's first goal Saturday.

Get Microsoft Silverlight

Barrett used the corner flag to do a mock 21-gun salute then saluted himself. He comes from a military family. It was Memorial Day weekend.

I understand that celebrations that are designed to taunt should be punished by a card. This card, however, seems like it’s a bit misguided. There is room for discretion in this call and maybe there might be room for the league to rescind the card.

Unless it hates veterans that is...

The line-up debate

Although the opinion is in the minority, there is a vocal group of Canadian fans that are arguing that if TFC doesn’t dress a full strength line-up, or something close to it, tomorrow night that the Reds will be every bit as guilty of disrespecting the Voyageurs’ Cup as Montreal was last year.

Toronto, of course, has already clinched the tournament and the game is meaningless.
It is interesting that all the attention is focused on Toronto dressing the scrubs. There is no mention of the possibility of Vancouver putting something out that looks less than first choice.

The reality is that the ‘Caps have every reason to be experimental in this match as Toronto does. Actually, Vancouver might have more reason with Toronto close to a two week World Cup break.

So, should the two teams feel an obligation to dress a significant amount of starters? Before we explore that question, we should dismiss something outright. Whatever the decision is it won’t be even remotely the same as Montreal’s choice last year. This game is absolutely and totally meaningless. Last year’s game determined the championship. If you can’t see the difference, you aren’t really trying.

The answer to the question, in my opinion, is no. No, not at all. Reserve sides are normal in cup competitions everywhere. In the World Cup we will see second choice line-ups in the third group games by teams already through. Why should a Canadian cup competition be any different than the biggest event in the football world?

For what it’s worth, there really wasn’t anything wrong with Montreal dressing the scrubs last year – and yes, I would feel the same way if Toronto were the victim of the decision. Many in Canada tend to be a bit naive at times when it comes to the realities of supporting club teams. Whether it’s an irrational desire for every national team player to be released every time Canada plays a meaningless friendly (or meaningless Gold Cup for that matter), or this idea of competition purity in the V-Cup, it’s clear that not every Canadian fan has got this whole club thing yet.

Expect both teams to dress younger players tomorrow. And, if you have a problem with that....get over yourself.

Or, take a trip to the beach or something
.

City's Money: The first rule of City's Money is there is no City's Money

In an effort to keep The 24th Minute on topic, I am retiring my on again, off again City's Money column. Instead, I will be writing three columns a week on the new Manchester City Supporter's Club of Canada* blog, Blue Canuck.

* The Manchester City Supporter's Group of Canada does not actually exist right now, but myself and another Toronto City fan, Chris Harris (no, U-Sector, not that Chris Harris) are trying to start it for next year. The blog is part of that effort.

So, if you like my ramblings on City and the EPL, by all means bookmark it. Also, if you are a City fan drop me a line at dgrollins@gmail.com. I'll keep you updated on the progress of the club. If you know a City fan, let them know of our effort as well.

There are lots of City fans out there. It's time that we found a space to call our own.

Sober Second Thoughts: Pretty goals and other things TFC doesn’t do

What is it with Chad Barrett and San Jose? Last year, he benefited from the worst timed groin pull in MLS history to score the game clinching goal in TFC’s 3-1 road win. Last night, it was a bizarre back pass that was Joseph Nane worthy.

What is that song they sometimes sing in terraces? Can we play you every week? Yeah, that’s it. Chad should sing that.

If ever there has been a 3-1 road victory with three uglier goals, it’s hard to remember when. Route one all the way. An empty netter. Ug-ly!

But, who cares? Toronto has had its share of pretty over its first three years. Amado Guevara, DeRo, even Laurent Robert at times, have all given Reds’ fans thrills. Other than DeRo, we aren’t going to see many thrills in 2010.

Again, who cares? Winning cures all, really, and TFC is winning -- somehow, against the predictions of pretty much everyone, a bit under the radar and with little fanfare, but winning all the same. They don’t give four points out for really nice wins. It’s just the three.

On Saturday, the Reds played one of the most effective road games the club has ever played – for 80 minutes. The last 10 looked a bit too 2009 for comfort, but Stefan Frei was there when the club needed him and just enough was done to hold on to the full three points. If you are a truly cynical fan you may chose to focus on the scramble at the end, but that would be more than a bit silly. San Jose was supposed to play positively – they were at home – the fact that it took as long as it did for the ‘Quakes to wake up speaks well for TFC.

Toronto finds itself all alone in second place now, in the automatic playoff position. Don’t laugh when I tell you that they are just four points back of Columbus. Do laugh when I point out the meagre 13 points that separate TFC from the Supporter’s Shield (but it’s good to dream).

Here is something to chew on:
Galaxy – 20
TFC – 16
Columbus – 16
Salt Lake – 15
San Jose – 13
Houston – 12
Dallas – 10
Chivas – 10
Chicago – 9
Colorado – 9
Seattle - 8
New York – 6
DC United – 6
KC – 5
New England – 5
Philly – 4

That would be the overall standings in MLS after April 15. April 15 is when TFC finally got its full line-up together.

Interesting, eh?

Anonymous commenting policy

Starting immediately I am erasing all ad hominem anonymous comments. If you want to attack an idea, feel free. However, if your purpose is only to attack myself, or another commenter, I see no value in that.

If the amount of personal attacks does not decrease I will be forced to turn off anonymous commenting. I don’t want to do that because I believe that the ease of anonymous comments can create worthwhile discussions. However, lately I have found there to be a dramatic increase in trolls in the comments section.

I will maintain a policy of allowing any comment to stand so long as it addresses the point of the post in some way. I also will allow any ad hominem comment to stand that is signed with your actual name, with a Google account – if you are going to attack me (or someone else) have the cojones to do so in the open.

Saturday, May 29, 2010

Sober Second Thoughts: And a goal!

Please tell me that someone has Youtubed Dick Howard's goal call (Edit: someone did) on Gavin McCallum's last second header to give Canada a 1-1 draw with Venezuela.

Ga-Ga-Ga-Ga-Ga-Ga GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLL CAN-NA-DA.



Dick. Howard.

You can understand the enthusiasm, actually, as it ended a dreadful 610 minute scoreless streak for the nats. It was also Gavin freakin McCallum, while illustrated just how, um, experimental the line-up was. One must be careful not to read too much into the result (and by "too much" I mean "anything"), but it's been a long time coming and it felt good to see a Canuck goal again.

The two game tour of South America ends on a good feeling and credit must be given to Stephen Hart. He went out and put a line-up together that was designed to test out the depth, results be dammed. So, to get a result is a very nice bonus.

On the whole the draw was probably deserved. The conditions weren't great and the quality on the ball suffered for both sides. The South Americans had most of the ball, as you would expect, but didn't do a hell of a lot with it. Canada tried to bully its way down the flanks and use its physical advantage to the fullest. The goal was from just such a play.

You got to do what you're good at. Eh.

And now we wait to after the big party. Canada has three games scheduled for the fall. Results are still secondary. They will remain secondary until the 2011 Gold Cup.

Until then we sit back and wait to see what kind of depth Hart can find.

Thursday, May 27, 2010

It's Called Football - Guests: Chris Wondolowski, Michael Vicano

Today we're joined by the San Jose Earthquakes leading scorer, Chris Wondolowski, to discuss their surprising start to the year and their game against Toronto FC this weekend.

Then we're joined by director of the Brantford Galaxy, Michael Vicano, to talk about their foray into the professional soccer ranks this year and the lengths they've gone to in acquiring players.

And then we'll get into Voyaguers Cup reform, the bitching about Montreal's time wasting and have an update of the AC St. Louis situation.

What to do about the V-Cup

Now that the Voyageurs’ Cup has been won, Paul Beirne has already Tweeted that the Reds are looking at playing some academy kids in the final game of the Nutrilite Canadian Championships. Since it’s not a MLS competition they can do that.

For those unaware the Montreal – Vancouver 1-1 draw yesterday gave TFC its second straight Canadian championship. All TFC is left to play for is pride – an undefeated record, a fourth straight clean sheet in NCC play, etc.). Clearly, it’s time to take care of the regular season. It’s not even a debate.

So, for the second straight year the weakness of a three team round-robin tournament are clearly illustrated. In 2008 we had the drama of an all or nothing final game and the result was dramatic. Montreal’s V-Cup clinching 1-1 draw against TFC remains one of the best games ever played at BMO Field in terms of emotion and atmosphere.

It doesn’t seem likely that next Wednesday’s game will match it – even with a post game trophy presentation guaranteed. Sadly, the smallest crowd in TFC history will likely be in attendance to see it.

Clearly, change is needed in the format. With Edmonton coming into the fold, change would have had to happen regardless. The question is what should be done.

The choices:
A four team round robin
A home and home between all four teams has the advantage of continuing the rivalries that are already being built – Vancouver and Toronto would play four games against one another next year with the Caps still getting two match-ups with the Impact. Edmonton would also get a chance to see all three of the country’s “big” clubs, which should help build that brand. The downside, obviously, is an additional two games on the two MLS teams schedule. It’s already tough to get the games in, add another two games and it becomes really tough. Also, you are still looking at an imperfect format that could see useless games at the end that no one wants to play.

A four team round robin with final
The final is needed, but how are they going to fit in one more game?

A play-in to a three team round-robin
The two MLS sides are advanced to the tournament, with Montreal and Edmonton playing a home and home to see who joins them (you could justify the exclusion of Montreal either because they are a D2 side next year, or because they finished last in the 2010 tournament). The advantages here are that it keeps the tournament at a manageable amount of games for the teams. The disadvantage is that it doesn’t have a final and that Edmonton (likely) doesn’t get to see the MLS sides come in – I would imagine that having a MLS home game is important for Edmonton.

Play-in to three team round-robin with final.
An extra game might be hard to fit in.

Regional semi-finals
Vancouver versus Edmonton; Toronto versus Montreal. The winners play for title. Simple and direct. The biggest disadvantage being that Edmonton will clearly be an easier touch. Also, Edmonton versus TFC would be unlikely to happen and we all know how much hating on T.O. is a cornerstone of Canadian identity.

Non-regional semi-finals
Either a blind draw, or a seeding process could divide the four teams up to eliminate the perspective of unfairness with the draw.

In an ideal world it would be nice to see the four team round-robin with a final. However, that’s likely too much football. I suspect you will see a semi-final, final situation. Regardless, it’s likely that another adjustment will be needed in 2012 as well, as one of Hamilton or Ottawa also joins the NASL (hopefully both).

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

To hate or not to hate

First of all, congrats to TFC on winning the Voyageurs Cup, they were the best team in the tournament and are worthy champions, although it would have been nice if Vancouver and Montreal put up a better fight. The Whitecaps have only themselves to blame, there is no question about that. They knew exactly what they needed to do and they didn’t do it, enough said.

The Whitecaps chances are now gone, but my detestation for Montreal still lingers. I was thiiiiiiis close to letting go of the past and forgetting all about last year’s Toronto-Montreal finale. That was until Montreal decided to waste time and kill the ball in the corner. Obviously the goal of this was to ensure that Vancouver would be eliminated.

I can’t help but feel confused about Montreal’s mindset. They said that they wanted to put in a better effort at home to entertain their fans, so why not go for the win? They were the better side down the stretch, so why not finish the game off and get your first win in the tournament in two years. Why not get out of the basement? Yes, they were already eliminated, but why defend their crown of crappiest Canadian pro team? The absolute only reason to do this was to piss off Vancouver.

I’ve been reading some of the comments related to this tournament and there’s been some debate about rivalries. If Montreal’s biggest rival is Toronto, then wouldn’t they have wanted to eliminate them last year, as they clearly wanted to do to Vancouver this year? If they did, it really didn’t show. In my estimation, they didn’t care at all whether or not they eliminated Toronto, even though it wouldn’t have been particularly challenging to do so.

This leaves a very odd predicament as far as Canadian club rivalries go. When I refer to rivalry, I mean fans and club. You can’t have a rivalry if the fans don’t care, and you also can’t have a rivalry if the club and players don’t care. Judging by each clubs actions the past two years, Vancouver and Montreal clearly hate each other. They are rivals. But when you put Toronto in the mix, things are far more unclear.

It seems that many people in Vancouver have been looking for a rivalry with Toronto, boasting their winning record against their MLS foes. But Toronto fans simply don’t care. Toronto claims that Montreal is their biggest rival, and both teams’ fans would agree. But frankly, Montreal has yet to prove that they care. If it’s a true rivalry you can’t choose when to care, as Montreal so eloquently proved tonight.

So basically, Toronto hates Montreal, Montreal hates Vancouver, and Vancouver hates everyone. If only the Voyageurs Cup was decided by hate.

It's Called Football - Guests: Stefan Frei and Peter Schaad

Today, we're joined by Toronto FC keeper Stefan Frei to talk about his strong start to the year, the speculation TFC is fielding European offers and he even tips his hand to who might be signing with the club soon.

Then, we're joined by Peter Schaad, the play-by-play announcer for the Whitecaps, to talk about their game against the Montreal Impact.

And we'll also get into the Canada vs Argentina game, TFC being crowned champions, as well as an update on FC Edmonton

All on the line: Whitecaps - Impact live blog



"We search for the truth/We could die upon the tooth/But the thrill of just the chase/Is worth the pain" - Ronnie James Dio, The Last In Line

Tonight's Voyageurs' Cup game against the Montreal Impact may well be one of the most important matches of the Vancouver Whitecaps' season. Thanks to a pair of lacklustre draws at home, they must win on the road [Marc Weber, The Province] against their bitter rivals to maintain their hopes of claiming the Nutrilite Canadian Championship and its attendant berth in the CONCACAF Champions League. They have two points from two matches, while Toronto FC have seven from three. The teams play each other in the final clash of the competition next Wednesday, though, so the Whitecaps still have a shot at the title. In order to make that game relevant, though, they need to come away with three points tonight.

As I wrote at Fighting For Canadian Supremacy before the season started, this competition may be the crucial one for the Whitecaps. A return to the Division II title game would be nice, but that would likely mean less in the long run than a defeat of their Canadian rivals, the franchise's first Voyageurs' Cup and a berth in the CONCACAF Champions League. That would give the Whitecaps a huge boost heading into their first Major League Soccer campaign next season. A Division II title would also help, but I'm not sure it would have as much of an effect. Moreover, the drawn-out regular season and playoffs of Division II make it much more difficult to reach that goal while developing young talent, which is still the club's top priority heading towards MLS. A short tournament like this should be easier to win with a younger side.

This won't be easy for Vancouver, though. They struggled at home against Montreal in recent clashes in both the Voyageurs' Cup (a late 1-1 draw thanks to a Marcus Haber penalty) and the league (a 0-0 draw where they couldn't find a way to beat Impact goalkeeper Matt Jordan). Coming away with three points on the road in front of the Impact fans may be even more difficult. On the other hand, Montreal doesn't have anything to play for (and they famously rolled over against Toronto FC in similar circumstances last season). Vancouver captain Martin Nash told me Saturday that the Impact won't be an easy opponent even if they field a reduced lineup, though.

"Even if they don't play their best lineup, they still have good players," he said.

Don't write the Whitecaps off yet, though. They finally found their scoring touch Saturday against Rochester, notching two goals and breaking a 276-minute scoreless streak in the league and a 296-minute scoreless streak in all competitions. Even more impressively, their defence has been superb. Keeper Jay Nolly recorded his seventh shutout in all competitions Saturday, and the team hasn't allowed a goal in 274 minutes of league play and 419 minutes of all-competitions play. If they can keep that defensive intensity up today and find the net on their scoring opportunities, they might just come away with a win today and send the competition to a crucial final match next week in Toronto. Find out what happens in the live blog below, starting at 8 p.m. Eastern/5 p.m. Pacific!

Your FC Edmonton is...

Jas Gill Goalkeeper Edmonton
Rein Baart Goalkeeper Angerlo, Netherlands
Tristan Ilko Goalkeeper Edmonton
André Duberry Defender Calgary
Antonio Rago Defender Edmonton
Daylan Meyer Defender Calgary
Neto Miguel Defender Sao Paulo, Brasil
Niko Saler Defender Lethbridge
Paul Hamilton Defender Calgary
Sander van Gessel Defender Breda, Netherlands
Chris Kooy Midfielder Calgary
Chris Lemire Midfielder Edmonton
Paul Matthijs Midfielder Eelde, Netherlands
Sam Lam Midfielder Edmonton
Shaun Saiko Midfielder Edmonton
Thiago Silva Midfielder Brasilia, Brasil
Kenny Sacramento Striker Winnipeg
Kyle Yamada Striker Calgary
Marcus Johnstone Striker Edmonton
Michael Cox Striker Calgary
Milan Timotijevic Striker Calgary

Google away.

FC Edmonton will play its first game June 16 against the Montreal Impact.

The rest of this season's exhibition schedule is as follows:

Ottawa Fury - July 6
Victoria Highlanders - August 11
Spokane Spiders - August 15
Miami FC - August 28

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Sober Second Thoughts: A tale of two games

The last time I watched a game with as little expectation for the good guys, there were 5,000 Ronaldo faux hawks in the stands at BMO. Canada was not going to pull off the upset anymore than TFC was going to stun Real Madrid last summer. The best that could be hoped for is something respectful.

That didn't happen. Yesterday, we didn't even get a Gabe Gala moment. Instead a 5-0 thrashing by Argentina did nothing but illustrate just how far Canada is from playing amongst the world's best -- I'm not talking about winning against the best either. Just playing. It's probably a good thing that we Canucks aren't in South Africa because it would likely be embarrassing. It's probably better to keep the squad hidden for a couple years until it's a little more competitive.

Perhaps I'm being a little too critical, but, beyond the first 10 minutes of oh-my-God-I-can't-believe-Canada-is-playing-there excitement there was nothing redeeming about that 90 minutes of football. It was just depressing. The Venezuela game Saturday will be a better measure and as much as it was fun to see a match-up against a big team it's probably best if Canada kept it realistic for the next couple years.

Is there really anything learned from getting killed?

The thrashing in Argentina was a bit of a buzzkill after Saturday's TFC win. Playing without the club's best players the Reds managed to gut out a result. This was a win that you simply would not have seen during the first three years (with the possible exception of the Colorado away win in '08) and it made me consider something absurd.

This club might actually be good.

Not total football, oh-my-God-can-you-believe-what-they-can-do good, but effective. Preki ball ain't pretty, but it seems to work. If you eliminate the first two games of the year when TFC's line-up wasn't set, the Reds are 4-1-2 (6-2-2 in all competitions) -- that's Supporter’s Shield pace.

The season is early, but it already seems a million years ago since the negativity overwhelmed this team. Now, it's a hesitant hope.

And that's a hell of a lot more than can be said for the national team.

I hate DP rumours

DP rumours often seem, well, random. You pick an aging international player, find a MLS city where he would "fit" (big ex-pat community) and plug him in. Often that's about as "real" as the rumours are.

So, I tend to avoid them until the noise is too loud to ignore. Then, with reluctance, I will pass on what I've been told and let the reader decide how "real" the noise is.

Over the past five days or so there have been significant rumblings about TFC signing a second DP. I was told that the paperwork had already been signed and that the club was waiting on the transfer paperwork to be completed before making the announcement. As for whom it was...

I was initially told "former Italian international." Then I was told "current Juventus player."

I was never told "Alessandro Del Piero," but, well, he has been linked to MLS (albeit to New York).

Like I said I hate DP rumours and I'll believe this when I see it, but the rumour is out there and getting louder. Decide for yourself how much stock you want to put on this.

Saturday, May 22, 2010

Whitecaps: A tale of two streaks

Saturday’s Vancouver Whitecaps clash against the Rochester Rhinos saw the fall of one streak and the continuation of a more auspicious one. Before 4,996 fans at Swangard Stadium, the Whitecaps found a way to break their goalless streak while maintaining their defensive dominance, coming away with a 2-0 victory.

Vancouver threatened early, but that was something we’ve seen before. This last stretch of games has been characterized by the team creating scoring chances but not capitalizing on them. Tonight was different, though, as Cornelius Stewart ended their scoring drought in the 17th minute. He collected the ball in the box after Marcus Haber’s shot hit him, turned and drilled it past Rochester goalkeeper Neal Kitson into the corner of the net. The goal came in the 276th minute of USSF-II play since the Whitecaps’ last league tally (April 29 against Portland) and the 296th minute of USSF-II and Voyageurs’ Cup play since their last goal of any type (a Marcus Haber penalty May 5 against Montreal in the Voyageurs’ Cup).

Perhaps getting one goal took care of the Whitecaps’ confidence issues, as they were able to add a second in the 51st minute. Haber made an excellent run down the right flank and won a corner. Captain Martin Nash, making his return to the starting lineup from injury, executed the corner brilliantly, floating a perfect cross across the box onto the bandaged head of central defender Greg Janicki, who made no mistake heading it home. It was only the second time all year (other than in exhibition play) that the Whitecaps had scored two goals; the first was their 2-0 win in their season opener against Minnesota.

Even up two goals, the Whitecaps continued to create chances. Haber had a good run in the 62nd minute and beat his defender, but took too long to get his shot off and had it blocked. He then had a 64th-minute header ring off the crossbar. Stewart and Marlon James also had scoring chances, but couldn’t convert.

Nash said finally notching a goal took a weight off the Whitecaps' shoulders.

"It was great," he said. "I think it took a little pressure off us."

Nash said they didn't alter their game plan, though. Rather, it was more that some of their opportunities finally went in.

"We've been creating chances all along," he said. "We had good balls coming in against Toronto, but we couldn't get on the end of them."

The more impressive streak continued unabated, though, as the Whitecaps’ defence again refused to allow a goal. Keeper Jay Nolly recorded his seventh clean sheet in all competitions and his sixth in the league. It’s now been 274 minutes of USSF-II play since the last goal against them (from that April 29 Portland game) and 419 minutes since the last goal against them in any competition (from that May 5 Montreal game). That’s an incredible run.

Nash said the defensive success has been a unified effort.

"The back four's been great, but the whole team in front of them has played well," he said.

Vancouver dominated the scoresheet as well, finishing with 11 shots to Rochester's six and four corners to the Rhinos' two. Despite the win and the goals, head coach Teitur Thordarson was only moderately impressed with his team's performance, however.

"I think we played a decent game," he said. "It wasn't the best, but we got two good goals and we had the chance to score more."

Thordarson said the clean sheet was nice, but the overall defensive effort wasn't as strong as in past games.

"We didn't control the game defensively as much as I wanted to," he said. "I wanted to see more possession. Back and forth, that's good for the fans, but not what I wanted."

Thordarson said he was pleased with Stewart's play, though, and he foresees using him more in the future.

"He was impressive today," Thordarson said. "He is equally good on both sides."

Stewart said he isn't taking his success or his place in the lineup for granted, though.

"I'm going to keep working hard," he said.

The Whitecaps now travel to Montreal Wednesday for a crucial Voyageurs' Cup clash against the Impact (8 p.m. Eastern/5 p.m. Pacific, will be live-blogged here). They need to win to have any hope of taking home the trophy and its attendant CONCACAF Champions League berth. Nash said the team can't get overconfident about Montreal having nothing to play for, as he expects them to still be a tough challenge.

"Even if they don't play their best lineup, they still have good players," he said.

Nash thinks the Whitecaps still have a chance at the Voyageurs' Cup, though.

"It's going to be a tough task, but I think we're capable of it."

[Cross-posted to Sporting Madness]

Whitecaps - Rhinos live blog

I'll be live-blogging tonight's USSF Division II game between the Vancouver Whitecaps and the Rochester Rhinos. Kickoff is at 10 p.m. Eastern/7 p.m. Pacific. A video feed of the action can be found on the Whitecaps' website. Come join me then!

Letter from CSA to ASA

This letter, detailing some of the mess in Alberta, from the CSA to Mario Charpentier and Chris Billings has been widely distributed. I provide it here without comment:

May 4, 2010

Alberta Soccer Association Board of Directors
Attention: Mr. Mario Charpentier
Alberta Soccer Association
203, 9440- 49 Street
Edmonton, AB, T6B 2M9

Mr. Chris Billings
60 Champlain Place
Beaumont, AB T4X 1R8


Dear Mr. Charpentier and Mr. Billings,
In follow up to the correspondence of 3 May 2010 sent by the legal counsel of The Canadian Soccer Association (CSA) to the legal counsels of the Alberta Soccer Association (ASA) and Mr. Christopher Billings and the correspondence received after this notification, I wish to offer the following clarification:

1) The Canadian Soccer Association maintains its position with regards to the current validly elected Board of Directors of the ASA (as elected and confirmed in January 2010 at the Annual General Meeting of the ASA).

2) Since the ASA remains a member in good standing of the CSA, the ASA, as a
member, has the right to be represented at the CSA Board of Directors'
meetings. Since ASA cannot be represented by its President, Mr. Chris Billings, due to suspension by the ASA Board, ASA will be represented by a member of the ASA Board of Directors, in accordance with the ASA By-laws. This was effected at the last CSA Board meeting in March 2010, with approval of the CSA Board of Directors. This representative will have a voice but no vote at the meeting of the CSA Board of Directors.

3) Since the ASA remains a member in good standing and has full voting rights at the Annual General Meeting of the CSA, the delegates registered in due time by the ASA will represent Alberta. These individuals are: Mario Charpentier, Jeff du Berger, Colin Innes, and Fred Kern.

Once again, I wish to re-iterate that:

1) All correspondence must be sent through the CSA legal counsel, Kelly Santini LLP.

2) Any litigation is contrary to the CSA By-laws. The Sport Dispute Resolution Centre of Canada (SDRCC) shall have jurisdiction over disputes between parties belonging to the CSA.

Finally, the CSA does not want to be involved in this internal dispute. However, if both parties (ASA and Mr. Billings) agree, the CSA will be glad to participate in resolving this conflict.

Sincerely,

Dominique Maestracci
President and Chair

The mess in Alberta

It's not a well kept secret that the Alberta voters were opposed to the changes in the CSA governance model. Although we can't know for sure why they were opposed, many can and have been speculation that the reasons have to do with a desire to keep the status quo. As things stand now, those in the power positions of provincial soccer in Canada have a good deal. There is reluctance to give that up.

What we do know is that there is a messy power struggle going on in Alberta right now between the ASA president Chris Billings and the ASA board of directors, lead by Edmonton minor soccer president Mario Charpentier.

The Edmonton Journal's Dan Barnes has been covering this story from the local angle very well. Keep an eye out for his work.

Pro-Billings sources in Alberta have told me that there are four individuals who are the driving force behind the issues with the ASA. They have succeeded in ousting Billings as president, at least as far as the CSA is concerned. He is suspended, with the board citing a bunch of violations that are in dispute.


The CSA has since decided, through legal advice, to side with the board rather than recognize Billings. The board, in turn, chose a single voice (we think Charpentier) to vote on Alberta's behalf at the recent AGM. The Alberta vote was against the proposed governance change.

A quick aside here: Since the AGM took place while I was in Spain, I have not covered it. If you're not up to speed take a moment to read Jason de Vos' excelent summary of the proposal.

Although Billings was not recognized by the CSA -- and wasn't even allowed to be in the room during the AGM -- he is still recognized by the ASA. Billings is a progressive when it comes to CSA governance change and some have suggested that the CSA took its position (to recognize the board rather than the president) to ensure that there would be resistance to the changes. Whether that desire wsa to help defeat the proposal, or for simple optics is up for speculation.

My source in Alberta says that the former could be likely because the proposed changes would take away many of the privileges that the CSA's leadership (i.e. trips to the World Cup and other FIFA events) currently enjoy. But, such thinking is speculation only. It deserves to be said that many others that I have spoken to have indicated that current CSA president Peter Montopoli is in favour of the changes.

Quebec also voted against the change. As of this writing I can offer no inside information as to the reasoning behind that stance, but one can speculate based on Quebec's stance in other areas. The province has never been much on centralized controls.

The next hurdle for the Constitution Committee is going to be getting the by-laws passed to create a new Board as well as to create separation between the Board and the staff (allowing staff autonomy, accountability, and transparency for their own actions).

It’s a mess, for sure, but when has anything been easy in this country when it comes to this sport?

Friday, May 21, 2010

Another open letter to the Montreal Impact

Dear Impact,

We know that you were embarrassed by your pathetic showing in your last game of the NCC last year, and rightfully so. The Whitecaps essentially had nothing to play for when they hosted Toronto in their final match in 2008, as they needed to win by 3 goals to have any chance. Yet they gave it their best effort, even though they knew they were eliminated when Toronto tied it up and then took a 2-1 lead. They fought until the end and earned a 2-2 draw, ultimately paving the way to your Canadian title and subsequent run through the Champions League. Last year, you only needed to stay within 3 goals of TFC. Thanks again for returning the favour.

No one wants to get so thoroughly dominated in front of their home fans the way you did when you lost 6-1 to Toronto last year. Good news, you don't have to! The Whitecaps need only a victory to keep their hopes alive, and to set-up a dramatic finale in Toronto. We're not asking you to throw the game, or even to give a half-hearted effort, we have more integrity than that. But you do have a very big game with Fiorentina this Sunday, which should be a wonderful experience for your top players. Why tucker them out with a meaningless midweek game against a team that you face 6 times a year? Have some fun, put your defenders at forward, put a forward in goal, and your goaltender at forward. Why not? At least that would make it interesting for the fans. If Vancouver loses, they have absolutely no excuse, their fate is in their own hands this time around. But a Whitecaps win is what is in the best interest of justice, and what is in the best interest of this tournament.

Sincerely,
Whitecaps fans

An open letter to the Montreal Impact

Dear Impact,

We know that you took a lot of flack last year for starting seven of your scrubs against Toronto in the last game of the NCC. We also know that you have promised to be good and fair this year and not repeat the performance, no matter how busy your league schedule is.

The Whitecaps have blamed you for more than a year for taking away their championship and berth in the CONCACAF Champions League. It's not talked about as much, but your decision to dress the hamburger squad also took away from TFC -- no one seems to remember that the Reds were 3-1 in the event.

So, as you stare at a second straight year where your final game is meaningless in the V-Cup we in Toronto have a message for you.

Please, no Please, put out the worst possible line-up Wednesday against Vancouver. Like, dress the coach's kids. It's the only way that we can finally get some closure on this.

I've written many times that I don't believe that the 'Caps would have scored six against Montreal last year. Let me find out if I'm right.

As stated, P L E A S E dress the scrubs. Then, if Vancouver wins it can say they are even; if Vancouver can't win Toronto fans can tell then to go, well, go do something to themselves in regards to last year.

In summery, it's vital to the competitive integrity of this tournament that you treat the competition without integrity.

Trust me, no one in Toronto will care. As stated, Torontonians will welcome Montreal's lack of ethics in this regard.

Remember, it's important to get a good league position. That's what's important. This is a good opportunity to test that depth.

You know what's "right" Montreal. Do the wrong thing.

Yours,
The fans of TFC

Thursday, May 20, 2010

It's Called Football - Guests: Jason DeVos and Andrea Lombardo

We breakdown TFC's snorefest versus Vancouver and set up the weekend games around MLS.

And were joined by former TFC player Andrea Lombardo, who is now playing for Portugal FC in the CSL. And CBC's Jason DeVos to discuss the changes to the CSA's governance model and where the fight is still being fought.

Sober Second Thoughts: A whole lot of Meh

TFC looked like a team at the end of a nine day road trip, a little beat up and that started Gabe Gala last night. Vancouver looked like a USSF D2 team that can’t score.

The result was a truly awful game and a well deserved 0-0 score line. Toronto failed to win the Voyageurs Cup, but maintained a firm grasp on it by virtue of denying the Whitecaps two points. Vancouver must win out to capture the trophy. Toronto needs only a single point gained or lost by Vancouver to repeat as Canadian champs.

It must be said that the Reds never looked like they would score on the night. They lacked energy and any sort of creativity in the final third. The game plan seemed to be get the ball to DeRo and see what he can do.

For its part Vancouver didn’t look much more dangerous, although the ‘Caps did have most of the ball. Outside of a couple chances in the last 10 minutes, however, they did absolutely nothing with it. Although Vancouver remained alive – and that’s how the game will be spun on the west coast – the result has to please Toronto more than Van City. Considering how Montreal has played Vancouver in recent times, it’s difficult to see how the ‘Caps can get the result they need next Wednesday (unless the Impact dress the scrubs – to which I say PLEASE DO). At least the competition stays alive for one more week, as it’s hard to imagine what an Impact – Whitecaps glorified friendly would look like and why Sportsnet would want to show it.

Preki chose to start an experimental line-up and it showed. Still, they remained orginized and have now allowed just one goal over their last four games. For a team that supposedly has problems at the back, that’s not bad at all. It’s now one goal for in three games, which is another story, however.

It’s clear that TFC lacks depth up front. So far O’Brian White has been a bit disappointing and if Ibby is ever going to feature again there is no evidence of it. Although it’s appreciated why the Paul Dickov rumours are underwhelming, at this point another warm body of any age is needed -- especially if TFC makes the CCL group stage.

Three years in the edge has been lifted a bit off of this tournament. Amongst the TFC fans that I watched the game with last night there wasn’t a sense of urgency like was seen in earlier years. Part of that is the fact that this year’s tournament has lacked any true drama. It’s also a product of some been-there, done-that. Vancouver has never inspired Toronto fans in the way that Montreal does. Any cross country rivalry that is there is largely one sided (and bound to become no-sided once the ‘Caps enter MLS and have the Sounders and Timbers to obsess over).

Following the loss to Vancouver last year there were calls of protest amongst many of the supporters in Toronto. There won’t be any calls like that today. That’s because no one seriously thinks that Toronto is going to lose the competition. Maybe that opinion will come back to bite TFC fans in the ass, but there simply isn’t any evidence in contrary to it right now.

The (Red) Devil('s manager) appears on The Fan 590

It was a surface interview, with some of the questions being so general that they were cringe inducing, but Alex Ferguson was forced to shill himself to the two puckheads that host Toronto's Fan 590 morning show.

To the host's credit they were respectful throughout. There were no "soccer sucks, eh" comments (which aren't beyond dinosaur Don Landry when it comes to soccer) during the interview. Landry couldn't help himself after when he made a joke to the traffic reporter that he should get credit for keeping it together.

I'm on a bit of a tangent here, but I simply don't understand why the interview wasn't left to The Soccer Show to pre-record. Well, I do understand -- its purpose was to sell tickets to the friendly against Celtic in July, that’s why. The Fan deserves some credit for increasing its soccer coverage, but there is still far too much ignorance about the sport amongst the station's daytime hosts. Some (Mike Hogan, Eric Smith) do a very good job researching and keeping it respectful when they talk about the sport, even though they both are not big fans. Others, like Bob McCown, will admit that they hate the sport, but have enough news sense to deal with it when it should be dealt with it (although McCown receives the most scorn of soccer fans in the city, he’s actually pretty good when he does do an interview with a soccer official). The worst offenders are those, like Landry, that are outright dismissive of the sport – no one cares that you don’t like it Don. Lots of people in your market do and it’s your job to serve those people with the appropriate amount of coverage.

ANNNNYWAY...

Listen here.

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Whitecaps - TFC recap: The scoreline remains the same

For the Vancouver Whitecaps, the scoreline remained the same Wednesday night at Swangard Stadium as their third consecutive match there finished in a 0-0 draw. This had much more to it than previous USSF Division II efforts against Crystal Palace Baltimore [Simon Fudge, WhitecapsFC.com] and the Montreal Impact, though; the Voyageurs’ Cup and its accompanying berth in the CONCACAF Champions League were potentially on the line against hated rivals Toronto FC. The Whitecaps responded to the occasion and played a superb game against a Major League Soccer side, controlling possession, shutting down TFC’s attackers and creating their own chances. At the end of the day, though, that superior effort merely translated into another 0-0 scoreline.

Head coach Teitur Thordarson was pleased with his team's performance, though.

"I thought we played exceptionally well in all departments of the game," he said. "I thought we did well and controlled the game. For me, the only thing missing was the goal."

Thordarson said this kind of effort against Toronto FC bodes well for the Whitecaps' league play.

"We're creating chances against a team that's in the MLS," he said. "If we can do that, we can certainly create chances against the teams in our league."

Defender Wes Knight said the team's been more cohesive lately, which has helped.

"The last two games have been a breath of fresh air for us," he said. "We're coming together as a unit."

The Whitecaps dominated the first half of play and created several good chances. The best was a Ricardo Sanchez corner that found an unmarked Nelson Akwari at the far post in the seventh minute; Akwari headed wide, though. Vancouver picked up five first-half corners to TFC’s none and several dangerous free kicks, and they controlled the run of play, but were unable to break the deadlock.

The second half was much the same story, despite a few halftime adjustments from TFC. Vancouver controlled the possession and displayed a heightened sense of urgency, and they were rewarded with a plethora of solid scoring chances. A Marcus Haber cross just missed Justin Moose in the 50th minute, and a Sanchez effort from 20 yards out less than a minute later didn’t miss by much. Luca Bellisomo had a superb chance late in the half off another corner, but narrowly missed. TFC didn’t control much of the ball in the second half either, but they created a few notable chances on the counterattack. Amadou Sanyang fired high from 20 yards out in the 78th minute, though, and Dwayne De Rosario’s 83rd-minute effort was parried. Vancouver poured on the pressure late, but their efforts were ultimately unsuccessful and the match finished 0-0.

The Whitecaps have now gone 279 minutes in all competitions without a goal. It's also the first time in club history (across the NASL, Canadian Soccer League, A-League and USL) that they've racked up three straight goalless draws. Their last tally was Haber's 81st-minute penalty against Montreal. Knight said he's not worried, though.

"I feel very confident in our squad and our defensive ability," he said. "The goals will come."

Thordarson said it's not any particular flaws in the Whitecaps' game that are keeping them off the scoresheet. In particular, he thinks they've done well to create so many chances off set pieces.

"The service off the corners is perfect," Thordarson said. "It's just a matter of luck."

Thordarson said nothing's changed since the Whitecaps' early-season goals; he feels they just aren't getting the bounces.

"You need a little bit of luck," he said. "Earlier we had that, later we didn't."

From a Toronto FC perspective, this was more of a disappointing outing. The Reds were outshot 10-6 and conceded 10 corners while only earning one of their own. Head coach Preki said he wasn't impressed with his team's showing.

"I don't think we played particularly well," he said. "I don't think we came ready to play today right from the first moment."

Preki said that might have been from a long road trip, or it could have been Toronto underestimating their opponents.

"It could be complacency, maybe a little bit of fatigue, but I don't want to make excuses," he said.

He did make some interesting lineup decisions, leaving the likes of Stefan Frei, Sam Cronin and Chad Barrett on the bench to start. Preki said he elected to go with Jon Conway rather than Frei in goal to give Frei a rest.

"We've got two good goalies," he said. "Sometimes, you've got to give Stefan a little break. I thought Jon did a good job tonight."

Vancouver now controls their own destiny in the chase for the Voyageurs' Cup. They have two points from two matches (home draws with Montreal and Toronto). Toronto has seven from three matches (two wins against Montreal and tonight's draw), and Montreal only has one. The remaining matches see the Whitecaps on the road against TFC and the Impact. If they win both, they claim the title with eight points; if they drop any points, TFC will clinch their second consecutive championship.

That's going to be a difficult challenge for Vancouver, though. They were 2-7-6 on the road in league play last year, and beat Montreal while losing to TFC in last year's Voyageurs' Cup road games. Thordarson thinks they can pull it off, however.

"It is doable," he said. "If we go into Montreal and play like this, we will create chances."

Knight isn't intimidated by the tough task ahead.

"It might be to our advantage," he said. "We go into Montreal with our backs against the wall. We have nothing to lose."

The Whitecaps' next Voyageurs Cup clash is May 26 at 5 p.m. Pacific/8 p.m. Eastern in Montreal. It will be live-blogged here. Come join me then!

[Cross-posted to Sporting Madness]

Toronto FC - Vancouver Whitecaps live blog

I'll be live-blogging tonight's crucial Voyageurs Cup game [Marc Weber, The Province] between the Vancouver Whitecaps and Toronto FC here and at The 24th Minute. It could be the game of the season for Vancouver, or it could give Toronto FC another Nutrilite Canadian Championship. Kickoff is at 7:37 p.m. Pacific/10:37 p.m. Eastern, but we'll kick off the coverage around 7:30. Come join me then!

Update: My game preview is posted over at Fighting For Canadian Supremacy. Check it out!

Ohhhh Amadooo Guevara



If TFC manages to get the win against Vancouver it will travel to Honduras to take on Amado Guevara and Motagua.

Oh my.

The rest of the draw is:

Central America 11 vs. Xelaju (GUA)
Brujas (CRC) vs. Joe Public (TRI)
San Juan Jabloteh (TRI) vs. Santos-Toluca (Mexican Clausura runner-up)
San Francisco (PAN) vs. Cruz Azul (MEX)
Los Angeles Galaxy (USA) vs. Puerto Rico Islanders (PUR)
Tauro FC (PAN) vs. Marathon (HON)
Seattle Sounders (USA) vs. Central America 12

If the Canadian representative gets through they will be in a tough group:

Real Salt Lake (USA)
Arabe Unido (PAN)
San Francisco/Cruz Azul winner
Toronto-Vancouver/Motagua winner

Who knows what RSL will do, but another trip to Utah won't be easy. Arabe Unido was a surprise quarterfinalist last year and Cruz Azul is Mexican (it will be Cruz Azul).

The rest of the groups are:

Group A
Real Salt Lake (USA)
Arabe Unido (PAN)
San Francisco/Cruz Azul winner
Toronto-Vancouver/Motagua winner

Group B
Columbus Crew (USA)
Municipal (GUA)
San Juan Jabloteh/Santos-Toluca (Mexican Clausura runner-up) winner
Brujas/Joe Public winner

Group C
Monterrey (MEX)
Saprissa (CRC)
Seattle/Central America 12 winner
Tauro/Marathon winner

Group D
Santos/Toluca (Mexican Clausura champion)
Olimpia (HON)
Los Angeles Galaxy/Puerto Rico Islanders winner
Central America 11/Xelaju winner

Since it's a requirement for any article like this....Group C is the GROUP OF DEATH!!!! Saprissa is the best non-Mexican side in CONCACAF, Monterrey is Mexican and the Sounders are taking this seriously. Even Marathon (likely) has been deep in CONCACAF before.

I'm intrigued by the Islanders Galaxy match-up. My early off-the-wall prediction? Puerto Rico wins it. The Islanders put all of their efforts into this tournament and they have learned how to win in it. Combine that with the MLS' barely contained contempt for the CCL and it looks like a potential upset again.

My almost a year out prediction for the overall champion? Cruz Azul over Monterrey.

World Cup coverage

Could readers please take a second to answer the pool on the right of the blog? It asks what kind of coverage you would like to see the 24th Minute take before and during the World Cup.

V-Cup posibilities

It's not that complicated, but here are all the possible scenarios heading into tonight's game between Vancouver and Toronto:


- Toronto win tonight - TFC wins

- Draw tonight:
With Vancouver loss against Montreal - Toronto wins
With Vancouver draw in Montreal - Toronto wins
With Vancouver win in Montreal - Vancouver would need to win against Toronto in final game; Toronto would need a draw or better

- Vancouver win tonight
With Vancouver loss in Montreal - Toronto draw or better; Vancouver would need to win
With Vancouver draw in Montreal - Toronto draw or better; Vancouver win
With Vancouver win in Montreal - Toronto win, Vancouver draw or better

It's Called Football - Guests: Simon Fudge, John Doyle

We're by Whitecaps writer Simon Fudge as we take a look at the group that the Canadian winner would be drawn into in the CONCACAF Champions League.

Then we're joined by Globe and Mail columnist John Doyle, who has written a new book entitled The World Is A Ball. It's an outsiders perspective on football culture and a great read. We have three more copies of it to give away.

We'll also get into Ferguson's predictions for Henry in MLS and what Man U is coming here for if they aren't bringing stars.

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

CONCACAF possibilities

We know that if Toronto beats Vancouver Wednesday it will capture the Voyageurs Cup for the second straight year and attempt to erase the bad feelings around their preliminary round crap out against the Islanders in last year's CONCACAF Champions League.

We also know that if Vancouver pulls the double against Toronto it will play in the Champions League instead of Toronto.

Draws complicate things a bit, but basically they are bad news for Vancouver.

What we don't know is who Toronto or Vancouver will play in the preliminary round of the CCL. We do, however, have an idea. The Canadian champion will be placed in pot A and will face one of:

Joe Public (Trinidad)
Puerto Rico Islanders (Puerto Rico)
Real Esteli (Nicaragua)
San Juan Jabloteh (Trinidad)
Tauro (Panama)
Xelaju (Guatemala)
Aguila, Isdiro Metapan or FAS (El Salvador)
The champion of Belize (99 per cent likely to be Belize Defence Force Football Club).

The draw is tomorrow.

They all should be beatable, but...

EDIT: Check the comments for changes to the draw.

Van City's last stand

A couple interesting advance articles/videos on tomorrow's fourth game of the NCC:



And, in print, from Marc Weber.

It's interesting to hear Teitur Thordarson say that this game is one of the "biggest of the year" for his players. He uses that as rational for the Whitecaps stepping up their game against TFC, where the club holds a winning record against Toronto over the first two years of the tournament. Toronto's only win against the 'Caps came at BMO last year.

However, the bravado that many Vancouver fans were displaying at the start of the year has all but disappeared. The 'caps are struggling and even the most diehard Van City supporter is admitting that TFC looks to be rounding into solid, if not inspiring, form.

Still, the lets-show-the-big-boys mentality is real. It's what allows the Burlney's of the world to go on FA Cup runs while in the CCC and it's what somehow gave Vancouver a 1-0 win against Toronto on Canada Day 2008. Toronto will need to show up, or it will be three straight trips to the west coast of Canada without a win (although I still maintain that the Reds would have held on in 2008 if they weren't pushing for a two goal win that would have gave them the advantage heading into the final game against Montreal -- there was literally no difference that day between a draw and a one goal win).

You would think that Preki will be hopeful of winning the competition outright on Wednesday as it would allow him to put out a true reserve side in the final game of the competition. That day "off" might be as big of an award in his mind as the CONCACAF Champions League is.

Lots of questions on Herold situation-- for MLS, not TFC.

As soon as I heard the news about Zachary Herold -- officially, there had been rumblings for some time -- I wanted to ask the question that Yahoo's Carter Daly did this morning.

How does Herold get to the point that he is drafted into MLS without discovering the heart ailment that has ended his career?

However, unlike Daly (and for once) I don't point that question at Mo Johnston. This is a kid that was a Generation adidas player, was in the US youth team pool and at the MLS combine. Are medicals not required to participate in the combine, become a GA player or through US Soccer? How come it took TFC's pre-season screening to catch something this serious?

It's particularly troubling that he was able to take part in the combine. As 99 per cent of you know, MLS is a single entity league. The onus on catching this should have come at that point (although I would question the medical practices of the GA program as well. They are making a significant financial investment in the kid. You would think that they would want to make sure that he was healthy).

TFC might feel legitimately aggrieved that this wasn't caught. A second round draft pick has now been wasted through very little fault of their own.

Of all the parties involved, TFC and Johnston seem the least culpable. If anything the Reds should be praised for doing all that they could to ensure Herold was seem by the right people. Dr. Ira Smith and Dr. Christine Lawless may have ensured that Herold can one day see a son or daughter of his own play the beautiful game.

Don't take the word of this writer though. Let’s hear from Herold's mother Beth Inniss:

“The support we have received at this very difficult time has been more than we could have ever imagined. We want to thank the Wasserman Media Group, particularly Aaron Maines and Richard Motzkin (and) all of the doctors, especially, Dr. Ira Smith and Dr. Christine Lawless, and to the staff at Toronto FC. Special mention to Mo Johnston and Preki, I have never felt such support from a group of people as I have in the past three months. You have all stood by Zac, and lifted him up. I cannot thank everyone enough.”


Toronto will be honouring Herold Saturday against New England by giving him a chance to stand at BMO Field as a TFC player. It would be nice if fans had one less beer pre-game so they can get there in time to say 'chin up' to the kid.

Monday, May 17, 2010

It's Called Football - Guest: Luke Wileman

Luke Wileman, from Gol TV, joins us today to talk about Zach Harold's retirement from the game at 17-years-old and to discuss Toronto FC's game over the weekend and the Vancouver game ahead.

We'll also get into the groundbreaking changes the CSA announced over the weekend and what it means for the game here. Plus we'll talk about the impact of Thierry Henry joining MLS.

And we float baseless rumours on why Duane is not back from Spain yet.

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Whitecaps: Chances, but where are the goals?

Saturday night’s 0-0 scoreless draw [Simon Fudge, WhitecapsFC.com] with the Montreal Impact saw the continuation of a disturbing trend for the Vancouver Whitecaps. They’ve now gone 259 minutes without scoring in league play since Nelson Akwari notched an 11th-minute goal against Portland on April 29. Following that, they went 79 minutes of the Portland game without scoring again, then held Crystal Palace Baltimore to a 0-0 draw [Marc Weber, The Province] last weekend before tonight's scoreless clash.

Of course, Vancouver did get one goal during that span, but that came against Montreal in last week's Voyageurs' Cup game, though, not in USSF Division II competition. They're still doing reasonably well in the league and lead the NASL Conference with eight points, but that's unlikely to continue unless the goals start to come.

Tonight's game was a little more promising on the offensive end, however, as head coach Teitur Thordarson commented post-match.

"I think it was a good game in all aspects, except scoring goals," he said. "We were a bit unlucky. We definitely were the best team today."

The first half was a largely lacklustre affair. Vancouver held the majority of the possession, but they weren’t able to do much with it. They did create some stellar chances off free kicks and corners, including a Ricardo Sanchez blast from 25 yards out that was parried by the outstretched fingertips of Matt Jordan at the last possible instant. Montreal had better chances from the run of play, including a Rocco Placentino effort that Jay Nolly punched off the bar, but they weren’t able to capitalize either and the teams went into the break with the score knotted 0-0.

There were a few more scattered chances here and there in the second half, but neither team really took over the play. Most of the scoring opportunities came off set pieces, and Nolly and Jordan put on a spectacular exhibition of keeping to maintain the 0-0 scoreline. Montreal probably had the best chance of the half after a superb Leonardo Di Lorenzo run down the right flank where he beat two defenders and crossed it in, but a flick-on from Hicham Aaboubou was cleared by Greg Janicki just in time. Vancouver’s best chance came off a long Wes Knight throw in the 87th minute that was loose in the box, but shots from both Janicki and Marcus Haber were parried by defenders and the ball was cleared. In the end, the match ended without an offensive tally by either side.

Vancouver did well on the stat sheet, though. They won seven corners and countless offensive free kicks, and looked particularly dangerous on many of them. They fired eight shots at the net and forced Jordan into three saves, as well as countless plays where he had to rush out and intercept crosses. In the end, the goals just weren't coming, though.

Sanchez made his first Whitecaps' start in place of the injured Martin Nash and created several chances, particularly from set pieces. He said it's difficult to stay focused when you're not playing regularly, but he took it as a challenge.

"It's hard, but you have to be prepared, you have to keep working and and wait," he said.

Sanchez said he felt the Whitecaps turned in a solid performance, even if they didn't come away with three points.

"It was a good game," he said. "I thought everyone played real well tonight."

Vancouver now gets set to host Toronto F.C. in a crucial Nutrilite Canadian Championship clash Wednesday night (10:30 p.m. Eastern, 7:30 p.m. Pacific, televised on Rogers Sportsnet and will be live-blogged here). Thordarson said he's unsure if Nash and injured striker Marlon James will be recovered in time for that one.

"With any of these guys, we don't know that they'll be ready," he said. "We're hopeful they will. Nash is still a question mark, and so is Marlon."

Thordarson said the Whitecaps can gain some momentum from tonight's game, though, as he thought was a good performance. He said that may be crucial.

"It's huge," Thordarson said. "It's always easier to come off a good game than a bad one."

It may have been a good game, but at the end of the day, the opposition's net remained empty. Vancouver will have to change that Wednesday if they want to keep their hopes of winning the Voyageurs' Cup alive.

[Cross-posted to Sporting Madness]

Whitecaps. Impact. Live blog.

The Vancouver Whitecaps and Montreal Impact will face off again tonight [Simon Fudge, WhitecapsFC.com]in USSF Division II play. The game has plenty of on-pitch implications, as Vancouver (2-1-2) and Montreal (2-1-1) are the top two clubs in the NASL Conference so far, but it also carries a significant off-field component. The rivalry between the teams is long-running, but it took on extra heat last year when Montreal's lopsided loss to Toronto FC cost Vancouver a CONCACAF Champions League berth, and again when the Impact beat the Whitecaps in the USL final.

This year, the two clubs battled to a 1-1 draw in the Voyageurs' Cup last Wednesday. Montreal was officially announced as the newest MLS team (joining in 2012, one year after Vancouver) on Friday [Paul Attfield, The Globe and Mail], so this will be the first time the two clubs face each other since that, but hardly the last; Vancouver will travel to Montreal to face the Impact in another Nutrilite Canadian Championship game on May 26, and they'll have further league games against Montreal on June 30 and Sept. 24. Tonight should be another exciting instalment in the rivalry. The webcast of the game can be seen on the Whitecaps' website, and I'll be live-blogging it from the Swangard Stadium press box starting at 7:45 p.m. Pacific (10:45 p.m. Eastern), so come swing by then!

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

It's Called Football - Guests: Stuart Neely and Colin Elmes

Toronto FC Academy Head Coach Stuart Neely joins us today to talk about their big plans for expanding the Academy and setting up a state of the art training facility. As well, he talks about which players he thinks will be ready soon to join the first team from their CSL squad.

Then, ahead of the CSA's Annual General Meeting, we're joined by Colin Elmes director of the TSS Academy to talk about BC Soccer's stubbornness in embracing professional academies. He's been at the forefront of the fight there.

That and we talk TFC vs Montreal and what the lineup will look like against LA this weekend. As well as Canada's selections for the friendly vs Argentina and how it will affect clubs across Canada.

Maybe if they wore helmets ...

Tonight we have a critical match in the 3rd edition of the Canadian Championship. The 2008 champion Montreal Impact play host to the 2009 champion Toronto FC with the home team in desperate need of a victory after garnering only a single point from their first two matches, though both were on the road. Montreal will also be looking for redemption after being thoroughly embarrassed by TFC in a 6-1 thrashing on their home turf in last year’s tournament finale. This, and the fact that Montreal has never beaten Toronto, should provide ample motivation. Adding further intrigue to the plot is the news from this past week that Montreal will be joining their rivals in MLS come 2012. It all adds up to a very captivating match, but unfortunately for die-hard Canadian soccer enthusiasts, it will be grossly overshadowed by the Montreal Canadiens game 7 in Pittsburgh. This is the pecking order of sport in our country, and one that is unlikely to change anytime soon.

Former Montreal Impact player Sandro Grande (now choking teammates in Lithuania) said after last year’s famous CONCACAF Champions League quarterfinal match at Olympic stadium that this is not a hockey country, it’s a soccer country. Um, as much as I would love to agree with you Sandro, you’d probably have an easier time convincing people that Peruvians can shoot lasers out of their eyes (or that you were giving Mauro Biello a neck massage). Although 56,000 people at a club soccer match was great, no one would have been there if the Habs were playing in the Stanley Cup finals. I would know, my spring league soccer game was cancelled tonight because the other team didn’t show up, choosing to watch the Canucks’ game instead (I’m sure they’re real pleased about that decision now). Anyone who experienced the Olympics in Vancouver this past year knows that this is a hockey crazed country. There were people lined up around the block to get into bars at 8:00am before the gold medal game, and after they won, well I don’t think I’ll ever see a celebration like that in this country again.

Toronto has certainly proven that soccer can be very successful in our great land. The crowds for TFC games have been amazing, selling out every match and creating a terrific atmosphere, even by European standards. However, TFC hasn’t really had to compete with the Maple Leafs over their first several years. The Leafs have been awful for some time now, and with the MLS season starting in late March, there hasn’t been a meaningful Leafs game since TFC’s inception.

The Whitecaps, on the other hand, have seen a minor decrease in attendance through the first part of this season, no doubt linked to the Canucks recent playoff run. In fact, with arguably the biggest match of the season coming up against TFC at home next week, the end of the Canucks season couldn’t have come at a better time for the 'Caps. With a week to get over the disappointment of another failed NHL season, and with the Lions season still a month away, the focus of Vancouver sports media will shift to the Whitecaps.

While soccer is unlikely to ever take headlines over hockey, there is no need to worry about the future growth of the sport. The good news is that the NHL season will be over by early June, while the MLS season is just getting into the thick of things. However, this issue does create a couple points of interest. First of all, if MLS ever decided to switch to a European calendar their teams would be in direct competition with the NHL and NBA seasons, hardly a recipe for success. Secondly, on our front, it might be in the best interest of everyone to push the Voyageurs Cup back into June and July. Remember, the first edition of the Canadian Championship ended in late July. This would not only give all participating clubs more time to round into form, but it would also give the tournament greater sports media priority.

The growth of the game is the dream, and the future has never appeared brighter. However, for the sake of future success, it’s important to recognize where it lies in the sporting landscape. Last year's coverage of the Voyageurs Cup was great, but alas it always seems to be two steps forward and one step back. It would be nice if Canadian Championship matches were broadcast across all Sportsnet channels this year rather than having a meaningless baseball game shown locally in Vancouver while the Whitecaps play their most important match of the year. Soccer may never rival hockey, at least until our men’s national team can make the World Cup, but at the same time we need to fight for our place.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

New job


Needless to say, but Duane's first day in Spain couldn't have gone any better.

Monday, May 10, 2010

It's Called Football - Guest: Declan Hill

Toronto's dominant showing over Chicago and what Preki's lineup will look like on Wednesday; Seattle's decision to refund money and how it will be received by the league; and how CONCACAF losing its mind will help Canada qualify for the World Cup.

Plus we're joined by Declan Hill, author of the Fix, to talk about matchfixing at this year's World Cup. And, with Duane in Spain, we have a special guest join us for penalties.

Seattle gives fans money back

The Seattle Sounders are refunding its season ticket holders after Saturday's 4-0 loss to league leaders LA. They will give one game free next year to those that renew.

Reaction is mixed to the move, with many praising the club for its commitment to winning. Others think it's a cynical move that can be off-set by a likely season ticket increase in 2011. Some fans say they would rather see the team address its shortcomings -- a lack of an impactful centre forward and a general lack of toughness -- rather than get a symbolic $30.

What's not known is what the reaction of the rest of the league is to the move. Single entity leagues tend to react poorly to unilateral moves by partners that could end up costing them money. There is also the precedent that this creates. What's to stop the 50 or so Chicago fans that traveled to Toronto this weekend from demanding that the Fire pay them back following Chicago's 4-1 loss at BMO?

The Seattle decision likely comes from the right place. I don't think it's cynical. Rather, it's reactionary and it demonstrates a lack of perspective about what it is to support a MLS team. These things happen sometime and if you give the money back once, well, you had better be ready to field the calls in August when the Kansas City Wizards beat you 3-0 (one week after your dramatic 4-1 win over Houston).

Sunday, May 9, 2010

Canada never to make Hex.

...because CONCACAF seems hell-bent on eliminating it, in favour of, get this, a 12 team final group.

Each team in the final group would play a home and home with every other team for a 22 game qualifying schedule. There was no word on how the final 12 would be determined, but one would assume it would remain similar to now. So, teams in the region would play 24 times to get to the World Cup.

This is not likely to go over well in Mexico and the US, which are already frustrated by how many minnows they have to play. Canadians, however, should be over the moon over the possibility since it would mean more games played and surely to God a shot in the final round of getting there (Finishing in the top 12 of CONCACAF shouldn't be out of reach).

Is it too much of a burden for the big teams? I don't think so, really. Yes, it is probably a money making grab by Jack Warner, but it is useful for smaller countries to get a run at Mexico or the US on home turf. And the true minnows would probably be weeded out in the qualifying round.

Using the current rankings: USA, Mexico, Honduras, Costa Rica, Canada, El Salvador, Panama, Jamaica, Haiti, Trinidad and Tobago, Guatemala, Antigua and Barbuda.

Really, only Antigua could be considered a true minnow (by CONCACAF standards) in that list. The rest can all give a good run to the big sides from time to time.

24th Minute survivor: a note

I dropped the ball this week by not getting the survivor post up in time. So, I made the executive decision to skip the week. The contest will be back on next week.

Speaking of next week, as many know I will be in Spain. However, I will be posting when there is free time (it's a bit of a work trip anyway).

Sober Second Thoughts: Wait, what time did that goal go in?

Three times Toronto FC has scored in the 24th minute. The day the seat cushions rained down, later that same year in the 4-0 win over Dallas and yesterday -- The day they honoured Danny Dichio, the man who scored the other two 24th minute goals, by putting him name on the wall of honour.

The Reds were scored on in the 24th minute once, exactly at 23:13 actually, but we don't talk about that.

Clearly there is something in the numbers. Nick LaBrocca, or the wind if you prefer, got the magic goal yesterday. Magic being the key word on a type of day that BMO Field has rarely seen. The Reds were the best team from the start, using the awful wind to their advantage then switching up to a more ball control attack in the second half when driving into the gusts. Tactical awareness and the ability to adjust on the fly has never really been TFC's strong suit, so it's worth pointing that out.

One thing that has been clear in the early season is that when TFC gets a lead it plays like it isn't going to lose it. This is a major difference from past years and one that is more important than any single player brought in. You simply can't see this team giving up injury time winners to the opposition, something that had become the expected norm in past years.

A word is needed now for my fashion consultant Chad Barrett. A brace! Who knew? If you are keeping track of such things, that's now three goals for Barrett in his last two games against his former club. The final goal, on the breakaway (off a brilliant pass from DeRo, who has got to be on the short list of MVP favourites, albeit very early in the season) was clinical. Or, if you prefer, un-Barrett like. His play should shut his critics up for a couple days anyway.

Finally, a question: What is it about the Toronto fan and his or her endless ability to be negative? I'm not talking about Mo Must Go banners here, rather an inability to pause for so much as a second to reflect on something positive. I heard more than one person complaining about this or that on the way out of the stadium.

Look at this guy's Tweets: 1 - Over on the SG boards, TFC flying high - the luv in back on, ML$E kool-aid all around!! #TFC plays a decent 2nd half, all is forgiven. 2- #TFC is weak, very weak. Mgmt even weaker. Ownership clueless! Play-offs, a distant dream. Mo must go!

He or she must be fun at parties. Seriously though folks, they won 4-1. Chill. There will be plenty of opportunity to call for Mo Johnston's head later in the season. Today, though, the Reds are in third in the east, right there in the playoff hunt.

And that's worth celebrating for at least a day.

Friday, May 7, 2010

It's Called Football - Guest: Rafael Carbajal

On today's It's Called Football:

We'll breakdown the Montreal to MLS announcement and discuss why Joey Saputo paid $40 million for his franchise after balking last time.

We'll set up this weekend's game of TFC v Chicago and announce our picks for this weekend's must watch MLS games.

Plus we'll have an interview with Milltown FC head coach Rafael Carbajal on what it's been like starting a professional club from scratch.

Crossing a line

I have promised myself that I will not bother with this fool anymore, but this crosses every line of good taste and human decency.

Bill Archer today writing in the Crew BigSoccer forums

If you want a hearty laugh, you should check out what TFC fans are saying about how this is a death blow to Columbus because we won't have them as rivals any more.

Honestly, is their arrogance up there absolutely bottomless?
Their whole team could go down in a fiery plane crash tomorrow and nobody down here would give a crap one way or the other
.

BigSoccer is the largest soccer Web site in the United States. It has more than 150,000 registered users and receives as much as one million unique visits a month.

It has influence. And Archer has been given a position of importance on the site as one of its feature writers. With the privilege of writing for a site as viewed as BigSoccer comes a responsibility. Archer failed to live up to that responsibility today when he wrote those words.

The fact that he wrote them in a team forum rather than on the front page of the site doesn't matter. He is identifiable by his name and his opinion carries more weight than your typical poster there. It creates an environment of hatred. Not every Crew fan that reads it will shake their head and think "Oh that Bill." Yes, it's likely rhetoric and he has a right to say it under U.S. law. But, that doesn't make it any less irresponsible.

Archer has often said that Toronto fans need to be held accountable for their actions. He’s right. They should be.

And so should he.

HT

EDIT: A Columbus fan on Twitter sent me a link to the RPB forum from last year where a reference was made to a TFC fan saying something similar. Clearly, that's inappropriate as well. The difference here, however, is context. The Toronto fan in question isn't a well known blogger on the most read soccer site in the U.S. If you don't understand the difference, I'm not sure there is much I can say here to help you get it.

Rumour: TFC v Fulham Bolton

The Charleston Post and Courier is reporting that a "mid-table" EPL team will be traveling to North America in July to play the Battery, Charlotte and...wait for it...TFC.

The reporter, Andrew Miller, says that there are seven or eight players on the side that will be playing in the World Cup including one U.S. international.

So Fulham then.

I asked the club for confirmation, but I don't expect they will give me any.

Edit:
I suppose it could be Wolves, but they aren't really mid-table and Marcus Hahnemann isn't really an American international.

Edit 2: Fulham has five internationals that will likely be in South Africa and two others that are borderline.

Fulham: Mark Schwarzer (AUS), John Paintsil (GHN), Dickson Etuhu (NGR), Clint Dempsey (USA), Kagisho Dikgacoi (RSA). - Borderline - Eddie Johnson (USA) and Pascal Zuberbuhler (SWI)

Edit 3: It's Bolton. A little birdie told me so. Not sure where in hell the 7-8 internationals that will be at the World Cup are on that team, but there ya go.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

A hat tip to Pat

On Saturday, Pat Onstad will become the oldest MLS player of all-time. He will be 42.316 years old when Houston's game against Chivas kicks off, passing Preki as the all-time oldster (there is a lot of Canadian/TFC content in this, as Preki's last MLS appearance was as a sub for Nick Garcia)



Congrats Pat. At this rate you might be starting in the 2014 qualifiers yet.

Hey look!

It's the Montreal MLS web site.

The Future of the Voyageurs Cup

I should probably be contemplating the consequences of the Whitecaps’ lackluster 1-1 draw with Montreal last night, or be commenting on the Impact’s 3 red cards in 2 matches, but in the midst of my boredom watching the first 80 minutes of last night’s match my mind drifted elsewhere. I got to thinking, what is the future of the Voyageurs Cup?

With FC Edmonton set to begin play in 2011, the Voyageurs cup will require some restructuring. Sure, they could simply add Edmonton to the mix and make it a four team round robin, but with soccer growing rapidly and new clubs seemingly forming every year, the single group format will eventually not suffice.

Now I know that the U.S. Open Cup does not get nearly the attention of the Canadian Championship, but there is a certain underdog aspect of the tournament that’s hard not to like. What’s more fun than seeing a professional club taken on by a team with “pub” in its name! We don’t have nearly the number of professional soccer teams in Canada as they do down south, but that’s not to say that we don’t have a great deal of tradition laden footy clubs. How about including squads from the PDL, PCSL and CSL? Heck, in the U.S. even amateur teams can enter!

As things currently stand, next season we would actually have a balance of clubs at different professional levels in both the east and the west. There will be one MLS team in the west (Vancouver), and one in the east (Toronto), as well as one NASL club in the west (Edmonton) and one in the east (Montreal). I propose a format that would integrate many of the other soccer clubs that we have in our nation without greatly disrupting the current setup.

The tournament would be split into two three team groups rather than one. In the west we would have Vancouver, Edmonton, and a third team to be decided by a U.S. Open Cup style knockout tourney. This tournament would include PDL teams (Victoria Highlanders, Abbotsford Mariners) and PCSL teams, as well as any other amateur entrants. The same thing would happen in the east, with a group comprising Toronto, Montreal and the third qualifier. The east knockout tourney would be fielded by PDL teams (FC London, Ottawa Fury, Toronto Lynx, Thunder Bay Chill), CSL teams, and again any other amateur entrants. The three team group stages would run the same way that the current Canadian Championship tournament runs with the only difference being that the east and west group winners then meet in a two game aggregate final series to determine the champion.

This format would not only expand the tournament to capture the interest of a greater number of participants and fans, but it would also reduce travel costs and stimulate rivalries with only two additional games added for the group winners. The PDL, PCSL, CSL and amateur teams would have to play the qualification tournament well before the start of their seasons, but for the chance to tangle with the big boys I think they’d say it would be worth it. Can you imagine the excitement that would be generated by a meaningful match between the Victoria Highlanders and the Vancouver Whitecaps, or by the Thunder Bay Chill hosting Toronto FC? How about the Montreal Impact against the Serbia White Eagles? Although there would be obstacles to overcome, this seems to me to be a realistic and intriguing possibility. Let me know what your thoughts are.

Ticket give away for Saturday

Thanks to Gatorade Canada I have two tickets to give away for Saturday's TFC game against Chicago.

The first person to correctly identify the answer to a riddle will get the seats, which are in section 109.

Send you answer to dgrollins@gmail.com

For the clues, follow me on Twitter @24thminute If you don't use Twitter, you can see my updates at the bottom right of the screen.

Please do not reply if you cannot make the game.

Clue No. 1 - I like Cougars
Clue No. 2 - Someone had to be first (twice)
Clue No. 3 - Dobson got it wrong
Clue No. 4 - I know MLS travel restrictions are tight, but really? A one-way ticket!
Clue No. 5 - I have something in common with Tyrone Marshall
Clue No. 6 - I increased the amount of PR action while with TFC

Congrats to Graeme Burk

The answer was Marco Velez.

Well kept secrets

Turns out that Ben was right.

The Montreal Impact are moving on up it would appear. This is good news, of course, if not at all shocking. We might be preparing to welcome them next March if it wasn't for Joey Saputo's ill-advised game of chicken with Don Garber during the last round of expansion.

Although there will be those that disagree with me -- strongly -- Montreal is likely to struggle the most of the three Canadian teams out of the gate. They don't have the advantage of going first like Toronto, or the history of Vancouver to fall back on. The Impact’s academy is likely the weakest of the three clubs -- it's more of a farm team now -- and the expansion market is watered down.

MLS players tend to be a little more educated than their peers in other professional sports in this part of the world and therefore a little more worldly (the desire to be a pro soccer player forces one to be open to other cultures), but, that said, the French fact of the province will be an additional obstacle for the club to overcome -- not so much for the players, but for their wives/families. Toronto has lost players because their families couldn’t get work in Canada. Add the fact that a family member might not be able to speak the language and the potential for this to be an issue increases even more (and before anyone defensively points out that the families of Habs' players don't seem to care, check out the difference in average salary between MLS and the NHL. MLS Players' wives need to work). Then there is the requirement to educate children in French (if in the public system). All in all that’s not necessarily something most mid-level, MLS career players want to deal with.

NOTE - I'M POINTING THESE OUT NOT AS A CRITIQUE OF QUEBEC, BUT RATHER AS A POTENTIAL OBSTACLE THE CLUB WILL NEED TO OVERCOME. THIS ISN'T A POLITICS BLOG. I'M DELETING ANY COMMENT THAT TOUCHES ON THE POLITICS OF LANGUAGE/NATIONALISM

There is a lot to love about Montreal, of course. And I'm not even talking about the strip clubs (which I hear good things about). It's one of the most wonderfully cultured and vibrant cities in the world. For a young American looking to play in MLS for a while before moving to Europe it could provide the perfect middle ground -- North American enough to ease the transition from college, European enough to give them a taste of living somewhere different.

It will be interesting to see how Montreal approaches the Canadian requirement. With two years to go there could be a real push to improve the academy and produce a couple French Canadian players that can step in. They will need to do something because by the time Vancouver gets done picking over the scraps that Toronto has left them domestically there probably won't be many Canadian internationals floating around.

Regardless, it's a good day for Canadian and Quebec soccer. Fans in Montreal can start dreaming of what French international DP they will bring over and how they will accommodate the approximately 5,000 TFC fans that will try to take the trip up for First Kick 2012 (it has to be).